Quantitative comparison of different working situations

Simulate the human body working in concert with its environment and compare working situations with relevant biomechanical parameters as e.g., individual muscle forces, joint contact-forces, moments, and metabolism. The AnyBody Modeling System allows you to analyze work situations (with and without assistive devices such as exoskeletons) by comparing subjects, scenarios, trends, statistics, and visualize and review the intervention effects.

Record the motion of interest (or let us record it for you) and analyze the internal body loads. Obtain in silico evidence of efficacy and safety by modeling specific intervention scenarios before implementing them in real life – choose the best fit intervention for implementing. 

Examples:

  • Offline multilevel ergonomic assessment of workplaces with or without assistive machines
  • Musculoskeletal injury risk factor assessment in work tasks (e.g., manual material handling)
  • Enhancement of conventional ergonomic assessment standards with biomechanical parameters as muscle activity and forces, joint reaction forces and metabolism
  • Biomechanical parameters to estimate physical fatigue from the perspectives of external loads and working postures
  • Body load analysis (e.g., spinal loading, knee loading etc.)

Contact us to learn more or to discuss how we could solve your problem

Selected papers

  • Oyama F, Du T, Iwakiri K, (2025), “Inadequate lumbar protection with load weight limits based on body weight percentages: An experimental and simulation study of the weight limits set by the Japanese guidelines for preventing low back pain”. PLoS One, vol. 20, pp. e0327175. [ DOIWWW ]
  • Rahman S, Sakamoto J, Yazaki T, Chihara T, (2025), “Influence of Working Positions on the Lumbar Joint Reaction Forces during Bricklaying Tasks”. J. Appl. Res. Ind. Eng., pp. -. [ DOIWWW ]
  • Skals S, de Zee M, Skipper Andersen M, (2025), “Estimation of joint kinetics during manual material handling using inertial motion capture: A follow-up study”. J. Biomech. Eng., vol. 147, pp. 1-75. [ DOIWWW ]
  • Shimizusawa Y, Matsuda J, Kataoka R, Inoue M, (2024), “A universal design method based on motion analysis by using motion capture and musculoskeletal model: Case study of product shelf height”. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 18, [ WWW ]
  • Skals S, Bláfoss R, de Zee M, Andersen LL, Andersen MS, (2021), “Effects of load mass and position on the dynamic loading of the knees, shoulders and lumbar spine during lifting: a musculoskeletal modelling approach”. Appl. Ergon., vol. 96, pp. 103491. [ DOIWWW ]
  • Fritzsche L, Galibarov P, Gärtner C, Bornmann J, Damsgaard M, Wall R, Schirrmeister B, Gonzalez-Vargas J, Pucci D, Maurice P (2021), “Assessing the efficiency of exoskeletons in physical strain reduction by biomechanical simulation with AnyBody Modelling System“, HAL.Skals
  • Ghezelbash F, Shirazi-Adl A, Plamondon A, Arjmand N (2020), “Comparison of different lifting analysis tools in estimating lower spinal loads – Evaluation of NIOSH criterion“, J. Biomech., vol. 112, pp. 110024. [DOI]

More ergonomics publications

Top